A Taste for Danger: The Hazardous History of Fugu

Culture Lifestyle

Lifting the Fugu Ban

Shimonoseki became Japan’s fugu center in the late nineteenth century. Yamaguchi Prefecture lies at the western tip of the country’s main island of Honshū and is surrounded by water on three sides. From ancient times the area flourished through trade with China and Korea and was known as the “Kyoto of the West.”

Itō Hirobumi (1841–1909), Japan’s first prime minister, was born in the area. During one trip back home, he visited a restaurant called Shunpanrō. The sea was rough that day, so it was difficult to procure any good fish. The flustered restaurant proprietor’s wife decided to serve Itō blowfish. Although it had been prohibited by law since the rule of Toyotomi Hideyoshi three centuries earlier, locals had perfected the preparation method.

Itō enjoyed the dish so much that he lifted the ban on eating fugu in 1888. He also granted the very first license to serve it to Shunpanrō, considered the finest restaurant in Shimonoseki. In 1895, the establishment played a part in East Asian history when it was the venue for the signing of the Treaty of Shimonoseki by Itō and Chinese politician Li Hongzhang. The agreement brought an end to the 1894–95 Sino-Japanese War.

A re-creation of the room where the treaty was signed at the Treaty of Shimonoseki Museum, near Shunpanrō. (Courtesy Sumiki Hikari)

The Thrill of a Brush with Death

In the ancient Chinese text San hai jing (Classic of Mountains and Seas), written over two millennia ago, it is said that eating fugu is fatal. On the other hand, the Song dynasty poet Su Shi (1037–1101) left several poems extolling the taste of blowfish. China’s history of eating fugu was interrupted by a 1990 law banning domestic consumption and distribution. During the quarter-century that followed, a number of Chinese companies achieved success farming and processing fugu for export. Since a 2016 decision to permit limited domestic consumption once more, interest in China has been rising again.

When I asked Hong Kong music producer and foodie Yu Yat-yiu about fugu, he said that he knew of no restaurants serving it in the city today. Some Hong Kong residents did apparently eat fugu more than 70 years ago, however; he noted that that his great-grandmother once suffered blowfish food poisoning. In Taiwan, meanwhile, most people who eat fugu do so at Japanese restaurants where the chefs have obtained licenses in Japan.

In Japan, fugu remains have been found at the kaizuka or “shell mounds” that served as garbage dumps for people around the country in the Jōmon period (ca. 10,000 BC–300 BC) and later. The endless deaths from eating the fish ultimately led to Hideyoshi’s sixteenth-century ban, which continued—if imperfectly enforced—until the modern era.

Fugu ready for preparation. (Courtesy Shimonoseki municipal government)

The appeal of hazardous blowfish cuisine was apparent since ancient times. Was the thrill of a brush with death really so entrancing? The boundless nature of human desire is enough to make one shudder. If fugu were not poisonous, they may not have become so highly prized.

It is now possible for ordinary people to order Yamaguchi Prefecture torafugu online for home cooking. It has taken thousands of years, but Japanese knowledge and techniques have overcome the blowfish’s toxic nature. Farming is also progressing. Nonpoisonous torafugu have been developed, and today diners can eat high-quality farmed fish all year round, rather than only in the traditional winter season.

Today’s fugu sashimi is tasty and safe. If one thinks, with a crisp, cool piece on the tongue, of how many have died in the act of eating over the years, the fish may taste all the sweeter.

(Originally published in Chinese on December 8, 2017. Banner photo: Fugu cuisine. Courtesy Shimonoseki municipal government.)

Related Tags

fish fugu Yamaguchi Prefecture

Other articles in this report